SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.26 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SH3 domain of GAS7, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HCCH-COSY, 3D HNHA, 2D 1H-13C HSQC-arom, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-15N HSQC-Histidine, 3D HNCO, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic
Sample Contents0.45 mM [U-10% 13C; U-100% 15N] SH3 domain of GAS7, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC - NC5
Sample Contents0.26 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SH3 domain of GAS7, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 50 uM DSS, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D HCCH-TOCSY, 4D CC-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 850.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinemen,structure solution,geometry optimization CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 refinement,geometry optimization,structure solution version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3 data analysis,refinement version: 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
4 data analysis,chemical shift assignment version: 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
5 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
7 collection VNMRJ Varian
8 chemical shift assignment PINE Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
9 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
10 geometry optimization TALOS+ Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
11 structure validation PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione
12 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read