SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.26 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SH3 domain of GAS7, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HCCH-COSY, 3D HNHA, 2D 1H-13C HSQC-arom, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-15N HSQC-Histidine, 3D HNCO, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic
Sample Contents0.45 mM [U-10% 13C; U-100% 15N] SH3 domain of GAS7, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 10 % D2O, 50 uM DSS, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC - NC5
Sample Contents0.26 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SH3 domain of GAS7, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES pH 6.5, 50 uM DSS, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D (H)CCH-TOCSY, 4D CC-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 600.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
Bruker Avance 850.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 structure validation PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione
3 geometry optimization TALOS+ Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
4 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
5 chemical shift assignment PINE Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
6 collection VNMRJ Varian
7 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
8 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
9 data analysis,chemical shift assignment AutoAssign 2.1 Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10 data analysis,refinement AutoStructure 2.1 Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
11 refinement,geometry optimization,structure solution CYANA 3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
12 refinemen,structure solution,geometry optimization CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read