SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8-1 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] AFV1p06, 88% H2O/12% D2O
Solvent88% H2O/12% D2O
Ionic Strength200
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298.15
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic, 2D (HB)CB(CGCD)HD aromatic, 2D (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HE aromatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D HNHA
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian NMR System 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 150
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 2.3A VNMRJ Varian
2 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 data analysis version: 5.3 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 peak picking version: 5.3 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 chemical shift assignment version: 5.3 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
6 automated noe assignment version: 2.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
7 structure solution version: 2.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
8 structure solution version: 1.2 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
9 refinement version: 1.2 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
10 dihedral constraints TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
11 structure analysis version: 3.5.4 Procheck Laskowski, MacArthur, Smith, Jones, Hutchinson, Morris, Moss and Tho
12 structure analysis WhatCheck Vriend
13 data analysis version: 2K.2 Molmol Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich