SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8-1 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] AFV1p06, 88% H2O/12% D2O
Solvent88% H2O/12% D2O
Ionic Strength200
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298.15
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic, 2D (HB)CB(CGCD)HD aromatic, 2D (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HE aromatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNCO, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D HNHA
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian NMR System 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 150
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis Molmol 2K.2 Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
2 collection VNMRJ 2.3A Varian
3 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 data analysis NMRView 5.3 Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 peak picking NMRView 5.3 Johnson, One Moon Scientific
6 chemical shift assignment NMRView 5.3 Johnson, One Moon Scientific
7 automated noe assignment ARIA 2.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
8 structure solution ARIA 2.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
9 structure solution CNS 1.2 Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
10 refinement CNS 1.2 Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
11 dihedral constraints TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
12 structure analysis Procheck 3.5.4 Laskowski, MacArthur, Smith, Jones, Hutchinson, Morris, Moss and Tho
13 structure analysis WhatCheck Vriend