SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.69 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR7614B.021, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HNHA, 3D Nnoesy, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic, 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D HNCA
Sample Contents1.25 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR7614B.023, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC_CT aliphatic, 2D 1H-13C HSQC_noCT aliphatic
Sample Contents1.25 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] HR7614B.023, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):4D CC-NOESY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 850.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 structure solution CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3 geometry optimization CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4 refinement version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5 geometry optimization version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6 structure solution version: 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7 data analysis version: 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8 refinement version: 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9 data analysis version: 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10 chemical shift assignment version: 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
12 data analysis,peak picking,chemical shift assignment XEASY Bartels et al.
13 collection TOPSPIN Bruker Biospin
14 collection VNMRJ Varian
15 chemical shift assignment PINE Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
16 data analysis SPARKY Goddard
17 geometry optimization TALOS+ Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
18 structure validation PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione