SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.2 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] RNA, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HMQC, 2D 1H-13C ctHSQC-31P, 2D 1H-15N HCN, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D HCCH-COSY
Sample Contents1.6 mM RNA, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY, 2D DQF-COSY, 2D 1H-31P HetCor
Sample Contents1.6 mM RNA, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Sample Contents1.2 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] RNA, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 500.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 11
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement VNMR Varian
2 collection VNMR Varian
3 refinement Felix Accelrys Software Inc.
4 processing Felix Accelrys Software Inc.
5 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore