SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8 mM [U-100% 15N] Domain A, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Domain A, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 50 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D HN(CO)CA, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HNCACB
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker ARX 800.0
Bruker DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, torsion angle dynamics
Details FINAL STRUCTURES REFINED IN EXPLICIT WATER BATH AS IMPLEMENTED IN ARIA 1.2/CNS 1.1. 20 LOWEST ENERGY STRUCTURES SELECTED FROM WATER REFINEMENT, CNS, INITIAL STRUCTURES GENERATED WITH CYANA
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement ARIA 1.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
2 structure solution ARIA 1.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3 geometry optimization ARIA 1.2 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
4 processing TOPSPIN 2.1 Bruker Biospin
5 collection TOPSPIN 2.1 Bruker Biospin
6 refinement Analysis 2.1.5 CCPN
7 peak picking Analysis 2.1.5 CCPN
8 chemical shift assignment Analysis 2.1.5 CCPN
9 data analysis Analysis 2.1.5 CCPN
10 geometry optimization CYANA 2.1 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
11 structure solution CYANA 2.1 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich