SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.4-0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] entity-1, 100 mM sodium phosphate-2, 2-2.5 mM DTT-3, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.215
pH7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCACB, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D H(CCO)NH
Sample Contents0.4-0.5 mM [U-100% 15N] entity-4, 100 mM sodium phosphate-5, 2-2.5 mM DTT-6, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.215
pH7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents0.4-0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] entity-7, 100 mM sodium phosphate-8, 2-2.5 mM DTT-9, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.215
pH7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D HCCH-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 500.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
2 peak picking NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
3 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
5 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
6 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore