SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.4-0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] entity-1, 100 mM sodium phosphate-2, 2-2.5 mM DTT-3, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.215
pH7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCACB, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D H(CCO)NH
Sample Contents0.4-0.5 mM [U-100% 15N] entity-4, 100 mM sodium phosphate-5, 2-2.5 mM DTT-6, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.215
pH7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents0.4-0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] entity-7, 100 mM sodium phosphate-8, 2-2.5 mM DTT-9, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.215
pH7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D HCCH-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3 chemical shift assignment SPARKY Goddard
4 peak picking SPARKY Goddard
5 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
6 peak picking NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
7 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax