SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data

Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.56 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] AR55, 72 mM LPPG, 20 mM [U-2H] sodium acetate, 1 mM sodium azide, 1 mM DSS, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] DTT, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC/HMQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-15N TOCSY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 2D 1H-15N HSQC/HMQC, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCACB, HN(co)CACB (H[N[co[{CA|ca[C]}]]]), HN(ca)CO (H[N[ca[CO]]]), 2D 1H-13C HSQC/HMQC, 2D 1H-15N HSQC/HMQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance III 700.0
Varian INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 40
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 extended conformation
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment version: 2.1 CcpNmr_Analysis CCPN
2 peak picking version: 2.1 CcpNmr_Analysis CCPN
3 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 chemical shift assignment software_3 CCPN
5 peak picking software_3 CCPN
6 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore