SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] optn550, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.12 mM DSS, 90 % H2O, 10 % D2O, 0.9 % sodium azide, 100 uM ZnSO4, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)273
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCACB, 3D HNHA, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents1.1 mM [U-100% 15N] optn550, 50 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.12 mM DSS, 90 % H2O, 10 % D2O, 0.9 % sodium azide, 100 uM ZnSO4, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)273
Experiment(s):2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details DGSA-distance geometry simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
2 structure solution X-PLOR Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3 refinement X-PLOR Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
4 refinement ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
5 chemical shift assignment ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
6 peak picking NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
7 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
8 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax