SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 95 % H2O, 5 % 98% D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HBHANH, 3D HN(CA)CO, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D H(CCO)NH, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 1H, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D HNCO, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D HNCA, 3D HNCACB, 3D HBHA(CO)NH, 3D HN(CO)CA
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 95 % H2O, 5 % 98% D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 95 % H2O, 5 % 98% D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)288
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 95 % H2O, 5 % 98% D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 95 % H2O, 5 % 98% D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 95 % H2O, 5 % 98% D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 95% H2O/5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Sample Contents1.0 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] ITK-SH3, 100 % 99.98 D2O, 0.2 mM DSS, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 3D CCH-TOCSY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 1H
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance II 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method molecular dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection TOPSPIN 2.1p4 Bruker Biospin
2 data analysis TALOS + Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
3 peak picking CARA 1.0 Fred Damberger
4 chemical shift assignment CARA 1.0 Fred Damberger
5 chemical shift assignment SPARKY 3.114 T. D. Goddard and D. G. Kneller,
6 refinement CYANA 3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7 structure solution CYANA 3.0 Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich