SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data

Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 3D HNCACB, 3D HN(COCA)CB, 3D HSQC-TOCSY, 3D HCCH-TOCSY, 2D aromatic 1H-13C HSQC, 2D aromatic 13C-edited NOESY, 2D 1H-1H TOCSY, 2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 600.0
Varian INOVA 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 50
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
2 peak picking NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
3 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 data analysis ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur
5 validation ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur
6 chemical shift assignment CCPN_Analysis CCPN
7 data analysis CCPN_Analysis CCPN
8 peak picking CCPN_Analysis CCPN
9 refinement TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
10 chemical shift assignment ARIA 2.1 Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
11 structure solution CNS 1.2 Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read