SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents7 % D2O, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] TRIS, mM [U-99% 2H] DPC, 93% H2O/7% D2O
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM Tris
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)305
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents25 mM [U-99% 2H] TRIS, mM [U-99% 2H] DPC-5, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM Tris
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)305
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 500.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 750.0
Bruker Avance 900.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 60
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution X-PLOR_NIH 2.24 Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
2 chemical shift assignment SPARKY 3.113 Goddard
3 data analysis SPARKY 3.113 Goddard
4 peak picking SPARKY 3.113 Goddard
5 data analysis NMRPipe 5.0 Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6 peak picking NMRPipe 5.0 Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
7 processing NMRPipe 5.0 Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
8 data analysis NMRDraw 5.0 Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
9 peak picking NMRDraw 5.0 Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
10 data analysis ModelFree 4.2 Palmer
11 data analysis PSVS 1.4 Bhattacharya and Montelione
12 data analysis TALOS 1.2009.0721.18 Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
13 refinement X-PLOR_NIH 2.24 Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore