SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents7 % D2O, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] TRIS, mM [U-99% 2H] DPC, 93% H2O/7% D2O
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM Tris
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)305
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCA, 3D HN(CO)CA, 3D 1H-15N NOESY
Sample Contents25 mM [U-99% 2H] TRIS, mM [U-99% 2H] DPC-5, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM Tris
pH7.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)305
Experiment(s):2D 1H-13C HSQC, 2D 1H-1H NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 750.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker Avance 900.0
Bruker Avance 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 60
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment version: 3.113 SPARKY Goddard
2 data analysis version: 3.113 SPARKY Goddard
3 peak picking version: 3.113 SPARKY Goddard
4 data analysis version: 5.0 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
5 peak picking version: 5.0 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6 processing version: 5.0 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
7 data analysis version: 5.0 NMRDraw Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
8 peak picking version: 5.0 NMRDraw Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
9 data analysis version: 4.2 ModelFree Palmer
10 data analysis version: 1.4 PSVS Bhattacharya and Montelione
11 data analysis version: 1.2009.0721.18 TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
12 refinement version: 2.24 X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
13 structure solution version: 2.24 X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore