SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents10 uM DSS, 25 mM TRIS, 75 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM [U-2H] DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.075
pH7.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D HNHA, 3D 1H-15N NOESY, 3D 1H-13C NOESY, 2D 1H-13C HSQC, 3D CBCA(CO)NH, 3D C(CO)NH, 3D HNCO, 3D HNCACB, 3D H(CCO)NH, 3D HCCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents10 uM DSS, 25 mM TRIS, 75 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM [U-2H] DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 90% H2O/10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.075
pH7.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D 1H-15N HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details Initial structures calculated with CYANA, no RDCs. Final 24 structures (12 submitted) calculated with XPLOR-NIH and RDC restraints
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 24
Conformers Submitted Total Number 12
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis ProcheckNMR Laskowski, R.A. et al.
2 refinement X-PLOR_NIH Schwieters, C.D. et al.
3 structure solution CYANA Guntert, P. et al.
4 data analysis TALOS Cornilescu, G. et al.
5 collection VNMRJ Varian
6 peak picking NMRView Johnson, B.A. et al.
7 chemical shift assignment NMRView Johnson, B.A. et al.
8 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, F. et al.