SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.2 MM TFB1 [UNLABELED], 20 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER, 1MM EDTA, 100% D2O; 1.2 MM TFB1 [U-15N], 20 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER, 1MM EDTA, 90% H2O, 10% D2O; 1.2 MM TFB1 [U-15N,13C], 20 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER, 1MM EDTA, 100% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength20 MM SODIUM PHOSPHATE
pH6.5
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 3D 15N-EDITED NOESY -HSQC, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D 13C- EDITED HMQC-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
VARIAN UNITY 800.0
VARIAN UNITY 600.0
VARIAN UNITY 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING, WITH A COMBINATION OF TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS AND CARTESIAN DYNAMICS.
Details THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF THE AMINO-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF TFB1 WERE DETERMINED USING A SET OF 1208 NOE-DERIVED DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 124 BACKBONE DIHEDRAL ANGLE (PHI AND PSI) RESTRAINTS AND 20 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS FROM HYDROGEN BONDS.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria THE SUBMITTED MODELS ARE THE 20 STRUCTURES WITH NO UPPER BOUND VIOLATION GREATER THAN 0.2 ARMSTRONG, NO DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINT VIOLATION GREATER THAN 2 DEGREES AND WITH THE LOWEST ENERGIES.
Conformers Calculated Total Number 62
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 n/a
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 LOWEST ENERGY
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution CNS 1.0 n/a
2 structure solution NMRVIEW 5.0.4 n/a
3 structure solution NMRPIPE 2.2 n/a
4 structure solution VNMR 6.1.C 6.1.C n/a
5 refinement CNS 1.0 BRUNGER, ADAMS, CLORE, DELANO, GROS, GROSSE- KUNSTLEVE, JIANG, KUSZEWSKI, NILGES, PANNU, READ, RICE, SIMONSON, WARREN