SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents4.5 mM Rubredoxin U-15N; 50 mM Na Phosphate; 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.3
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH6.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):soft HNCA-E.COSY, modified HNCO, phase-modulated HSQC
Sample Contents2.5 mM Rubredoxin U-15N; 50 mM Na Phosphate ; 50 mM NaCl; pH 6.3; 7% Bicelle (3:1 DMPC:DHPC with 4% CTAB relative to DMPC)
SolventBicelles in 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength50 mM NaCl
pH6.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):soft HNCA-E.COSY, modified HNCO, phase-modulated HSQC
Sample Contents4.5 mM Rubredoxin U-15N; 50 mM Na Phosphate; 100 mM NaCl; pH 6.3; PF1 phage sample
SolventPhage in 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH6.3
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):soft HNCA-E.COSY, modified HNCO, phase-modulated HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Varian INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method RDC directed fragment assembly
Details RDCs were used in the initial assembly of 6 fragments. RDCs from two media were used to set relative orientation of fragments. Translational relationships of fragments were dictated by sequence connectivities. The assembled structure was minimized using a molecular force field and RDC error function. All sidechain atoms beyond CB are missing.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 fewest violations
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 Structure was determined using residual dipolar couplings from backbone atom pairs; modeled as an Ala-Gly polypeptide
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis REDCAT 1.0 Valafar, H. & Prestegard, J.H.
2 refinement XPLOR-NIH 2.9.1 Schwieters, C.D., Kuszewski, J.J., Tjandra, N. & Clore, G.M.
3 structure solution REDCRAFT 1.0 Valafar, H. & Prestegard, J.H.