SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM U-15N; 20mM Phosphate; 100mM NaCl; 1mM NaN3
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM U-13C,15N; 20mM Phosphate; 100mM NaCl; 1mM NaN3
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM U-15N; 20mM Phosphate; 100mM NaCl; 1mM NaN3; 5% n-octyl-penta(ethylene glycol):octanol 0.96:1
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):IPAP
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Varian UNITYplus 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details the structures are based on a total of 1959 restraints, 1863 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 174 dihedral angle restraints,96 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds, 96 residual dipolar couplings
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection VNMR 6.1B varian
2 refinement CNS 1.1 Brunger, A.T.
3 processing NMRPipe 1 Delaglio, F.
4 data analysis ANSIG 1.0.3 Kraulis, P.J.