SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM LNRA U-15N, 10mM Ca2+, 0.5mM DSS pH 6.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM Ca2+
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated TOCSY, 2D TOCSY, 15N-HSQC, 15N-HMQC-J
Sample Contents1mM LNRA U-15N,13C, 10mM Ca2+, 0.5mM DSS pH 6.5
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM Ca2+
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):HNCA, HNCOCA, 13C HSQC
Sample Contents1.5mM LNRA U-15N,13C, 10 mM Ca2+, 0.5mM DSS, 50 mM deuterated PIPES pH 7.0
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM Ca2+, 50mM PIPES
pH7.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated TOCSY, 2D TOCSY, 15N-HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITY 400.0
Bruker DMX 500.0
Bruker DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry, torsion angle dynamics, simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria all calculated structures submitted,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 16
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 1.1 Brunger
2 structure solution CNS 1.1 Brunger
3 data analysis NmrView 5.0.4 Johnson, B.
4 processing NMRPipe Delaglio, F.
5 collection XWINNMR n/a