SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM CheY2, 1MM TRIS-HCL, 5MM MGCL2, 5MM BECL2, 50MM NAF
Solvent5mM MgCl2, 20mM Tris/HCl
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.83
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, CBCA(CO)CA, HBHA(CO)NH, HCCH-TOCSY, CC(CO)NH, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNCA, HNCO, HN(CO)CA
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 800.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method torsion angle dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 250
Conformers Submitted Total Number 16
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 TOTAL NUMBER OF NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 1595, NUMBER OF INTRA-RESIDUE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 815, NUMBER OF SEQUENTIAL NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 406, NUMBER OF MEDIUM RANGE NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 155, NUMBER OF LONG RANGE (I,J, J > I+4) NOES USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 219, NUMBER OF DIHEDRAL ANGLES RESTRAINTS USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 58, NUMBER OF HYDROGEN BOND RESTRAINTS USED FOR THE CALCULATION: 7, MINIMAL TARGET FUNCTION WAS 1.92, MEAN TARGET FUNCTION OF 16 STRUCTURES WAS 1.95 (+-0.2), THE NUMBER OF NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.02 NM WAS 5 (+-2), THE NUMBER OF NOE VIOLATIONS > 0.03 NM WAS 0, THE NUMBER OF DIHEDRAL ANGLES VIOLATIONS > 10 DEGREES WAS 0, RMSDS BACK BONE (6-124): 0.027 (+-0.007) NM, RMSDS ALL HEAVY ATOMS (6-124): 0.083 (+-0.013)NM
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement DIANA 1.5 Guentert
2 structure solution DIANA 1.5 Guentert
3 data analysis AURELIA 2.7.9 Bruker
4 collection XWINNMR 2.5 Bruker