SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.5-1.5mM HCV IRES domain II RNA 10mM phosphate buffer 100mM sodium chloride 5mM magnesium chloride
Solvent96% D2O, 4% H2O
Ionic Strength100mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2
pH6.40
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D S-NOESY
Sample Contents0.5-1.5mM HCV IRES domain II RNA 10mM phosphate buffer 100mM sodium chloride 5mM magnesium chloride
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength100mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2
pH6.40
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, DQF-COSY, 2D HP-COSY
Sample Contents0.5-1.5mM HCV IRES domain II RNA U-15N,13C 10mM phosphate buffer 100mM sodium chloride 5mM magnesium chloride
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength100mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2
pH6.40
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D HCP, 3D HMQC-TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Varian INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method see reference above
Details see reference above
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria minimized average structure
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was solved using triple resonance, multidimensional NMR spectroscopy and TROSY-type experiments to measure residual dipolar couplings
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement PALES 1 Zweckstetter, M. & Bax, A.
2 refinement CNS 1.1 Brunger, A.T. et al
3 refinement X-PLOR 3.1 Brunger, A.T.
4 data analysis SPARKY 3 Goddard, T.D. & Kneller D.G.
5 processing VNMR 6.1C Varian