SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM CstF U-15N, 20mM phosphate buffer
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 15N-HSQC
Sample Contents1mM CstF U-15N,13C, 20mM phosphate buffer
Solvent93% H2O/7% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):13C-HSQC, HNCA, HNCO, CBCA(CO)NH, HCCH-COSY
Sample Contents1mM CstF , 20mM phosphate buffer
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20mM
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 600.0
Bruker DRX 500.0
Bruker Avance 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing torsion angle dynamics
Details The structures are based on a total of 1486 NOE-derived distance contraints and 115 dihedral angle restrains for phi and psi backbone angles obtained from the analysis of the 13C chemical shifts.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria The submitted conformer models are the 20 structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 40
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 fewest violations
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resoncance NMR spectroscopy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 processing version: 2001 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Pfeifer, Bax
2 structure solution version: 1.5 DYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler, Herrmann
3 data analysis version: 2001 TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio, Bax
4 refinement version: 1.5 DYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler, Herrmann