SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.5mM L18 U-15N; 20mM phosphate buffer; 200mM NaCl; 5mM MgCl2
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength12mM KH2PO4; 8mM NaH2PO4; 200mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2
pH6.0
Pressure1atm
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1.5mM L18 U-15N,13C; 20mM phosphate buffer; 200mM NaCl; 5mM MgCl2
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength12mM KH2PO4; 8mM NaH2PO4; 200mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2
pH6.0
Pressure1atm
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM L18; 20mM phosphate buffer; 200mM NaCl; 5mM MgCl2
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength12mM KH2PO4; 8mM NaH2PO4; 200mM NaCl, 5mM MgCl2
pH6.0
Pressure1atm
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITY 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method Aria was used to select and assign peak lists from NOESY experiments. CNS as modified for use with ARIA was used for structure calculation using torsion angle simulated annealing.
Details The structures are based on a total of 2272 restraints. 1188 are unambiguous distance constraints, 913 are ambiguous distance constraints, 128 are dihedral angle restraints, and 43 are hydrogen bond restraints.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 150
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using triple resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis Sparky 3.93 Goddard, T.D. & Kneller, D.G.
2 structure solution ARIA 1.2 Linge, J.P. & Nilges, M.
3 processing FELIX 97.0 Biosym/MSI
4 refinement ARIA 1.2 Linge, J.P. & Nilges, M.
5 structure solution CNS 1.0 Brunger, A.T. et al.
6 refinement CNS 1.0 Brunger, A.T. et al.