SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.7mM BRCT-c; U-15N,13C, 20mM Potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM d10-DTT, 99.98% D2O
Solvent99.98% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.8
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)295.9
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1.3 mM BRCT-c; U-15N, 20 mM Potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM d10-DTT, 93% H2O, 7% D2O
Solvent93% H2O, 7% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.8
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)295.9
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 2D NOESY, HNHA
Sample Contents1.3 mM BRCT-c; U-15N, 20 mM Potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM d10-DTT, 99.98% D2O
Solvent99.98% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH6.8
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)295.9
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D TOCSY, DQF-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, distance geometry
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 250
Conformers Submitted Total Number 15
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 1.0 Brunger, A.
2 refinement X-PLOR 3.8 Brunger, A.
3 processing ANSIG 3.3 Kraulis
4 processing AZARA 2.1 Boucher, W.
5 data analysis XWINNMR 1.3 Bruker Analytik GmbH