SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 mM Bcl-w
Solvent50mM Sodium Phosphate, 70mM NaCl, 2mM TCEP, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength120mM
pH6.7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303.15
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1 mM, U-15N Bcl-w
Solvent50mM Sodium Phosphate, 70mM NaCl, 2mM TCEP, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength120mM
pH6.7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303.15
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA
Sample Contents1 mM, U-13C, 15N, Bcl-w
Solvent50mM Sodium Phosphate, 70mM NaCl, 2mM TCEP, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength120mM
pH6.7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)303.15
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry torsion angle dynamics simulated annealing
Details the structures are based on a total of 3871 constraints. Distance constraints: 694 intraresidue; 843 sequential; 912 short range; 993 long range; 64 hydrogen bonds Dihedral angle constraints: 136 phi constraints; 101 psi constraints; 34 chi1 constraints; 30 chi2 constraints
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with acceptable covalent geometry, structures with the least restraint violations, structures with the lowest energy, target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 256
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using heteronuclear 3D NMR.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker A.G.
2 data analysis version: 1.3 XEASY Bartels et al. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 6, 1-10.
3 structure solution version: 1.5 DYANA Guntert et al. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 273, 283-298.
4 refinement version: 1.1 CNS Brunger et al. Acta Crystallogr. D, 1998, 54, 905-921.