SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.2mM NusG N-domain, 50mM phosphate buffer, 100mM KCL, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM phosphate, 100mM KCl
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)318
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1.2mM 15N NusG N-domain, 50mM phosphate buffer, 100mM KCL, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM phosphate, 100mM KCl
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)318
Experiment(s):HMQC-J
Sample Contents1.2mM 15N NusG N-domain, 50mM phosphate buffer, 100mM KCL, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength50mM phosphate, 100mM KCl
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)318
Experiment(s):HSQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker DMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, torsion angle dynamics
Details 1356 UNAMBIGUOUS NOE DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 90 HYDROGEN BOND RESTRAINTS, 82 HN-N DIPOLAR COUPLINGS, NO RESONANCES WERE ASSIGNED FOR MET 1, GLU 50, GLY 51, PRO 89, GLY 90, GLY 93, GLY 98 AND MET 99
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy, NONE WITH DISTANCE VIOLATIONS > 0.2 ANGSTROMS, NONE WITH DIHEDRAL ANGLE RESTRAINT VIOLATIONS > 2 DEGREES
Conformers Calculated Total Number 90
Conformers Submitted Total Number 31
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 Model 31 is the minimized average structure
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 processing version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker
2 data analysis version: 3.3 ANSIG Kraulis
3 structure solution version: 1.1 CNS Brunger
4 refinement version: 1.1 CNS --