SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.5 mM TipAS U-15N, 5mM phosphate buffer, 5mM DTT
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength6 mM
pH5.9
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):standard triple and double resonance experiments
Sample Contents1.5 mM TipAS U-15N,13C, 5mM phosphate buffer, 5mM DTT
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength6 mM
pH5.9
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):standard triple and double resonance experiments
Sample Contents1.5 mM TipAS U-15N,13C, 5mM phosphate buffer, 5mM DTT
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength6 mM
pH5.9
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):standard triple and double resonance experiments
Sample Contents0.8 mM TipAS U-15N,13C, 10 mr/ml Pf1 phages, 5mM phosphate buffer, 5mM DTT
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength6 mM
pH5.9
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):standard triple and double resonance experiments
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker DRX 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing with torsion angle dynamics
Details the missing residues in REMARK 465 are missing in the structure due to disorder, but had been present during the experiment.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 160
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 standard triple and double resonance experiments as described in Grzesiek et al. (1997), Protein Science 6, 1248-1263.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution version: 3.851 with modifications X-PLOR Brunger
2 refinement version: 3.851 X-PLOR Brunger
3 processing version: 2.1 NMRPipe Delaglio et al.
4 data analysis version: 1.2 Xeasy Bartels
5 data analysis version: 4.3.2 Pipp Garrett
6 collection version: 2.6 XWINNMR --