SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2mM 110C DNA; 10mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5; 150mM NaCl;
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength150mM NaCl
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)278
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents2mM 110C DNA; 10mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5; 150mM NaCl;
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength150mM NaCl
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D TOCSY, DQF-COSY
Sample Contents1mM 110C DNA; 10mM phosphate buffer pH 6.5; 150mM NaCl; , 13C8 and 15N6 and 15N9 of A12 and A15
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength150mM NaCl
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):HMQC
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method minimization molecular dynamics
Details Structure is derived from 191 NOES of which, 25 involve exchangeable protons in the stem, 153 NOEs involve non-exchangeable protons in the stem, 13 NOEs involve non-exchangeable protons in the loop, 50 Distance restraints involve hydrogen bonds, and 44 dihedral angle restraints.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria Submitted conformers include average from molecular dynamics and 3 representative diverging structures.
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 4
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis version: 98 FELIX Biosym
2 structure solution version: 4.1 Amber Pearlman, D.A., Case, D.A., Caldwell, J.W., Ross, W.S., Cheatham, T.E., Ferguson, D.M., Seibel, G.L., Singh, U.C., Weiner, P.K., and Kollman, P.A.
3 refinement version: 4.1 Amber Pearlman, D.A., Case, D.A., Caldwell, J.W., Ross, W.S., Cheatham, T.E., Ferguson, D.M., Seibel, G.L., Singh, U.C., Weiner, P.K., and Kollman, P.A.