SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8mM L23 U-15N,13C; 50mM KH2PO4, pH=5.1, 200mM LiCl2
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.2M LiCl2
pH5.1
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, CBCANH,CBCA(CO)NH,HNCO,HNCA,HN(CO)CA,C(CO)NH,HC(CO)NH,HCCH-COSY,HCCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents0.8mM L23 U-15N; 50mM KH2PO4, pH=5.1, 200mM LiCl2
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.2M LiCl2
pH5.1
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 2D 15N-HSQC,3D 15N-DIPSI-HSQC, 2D 1H-DQF-COSY, 2D 1H-clean-TOCSY, 2D 1H-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Bruker AVANCE 500.0
Bruker AVANCE 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, energy minimization
Details Distance restraints: 1660 Dihedral angle restraints: 61
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria accept.inp (XPLOR), low energy and good Ramachandran behaviour.
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 29
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis MOLMOL 2K.1 Koradi, R.
2 data analysis TALOS 1999.019.15.47 Cornilescu, G.
3 data analysis AQUA 3.2 Laskowski, R.A.
4 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 n/a
5 data analysis ANSIG 1.02 Helgstrand, M.
6 processing NMRPipe 2.1 Delaglio, F.
7 processing XWINNMR 2.6 Bruker Biospin
8 collection XWINNMR 2.6 Bruker Biospin