SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8mM L23 U-15N,13C; 50mM KH2PO4, pH=5.1, 200mM LiCl2
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.2M LiCl2
pH5.1
Pressure1
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, CBCANH,CBCA(CO)NH,HNCO,HNCA,HN(CO)CA,C(CO)NH,HC(CO)NH,HCCH-COSY,HCCH-TOCSY
Sample Contents0.8mM L23 U-15N; 50mM KH2PO4, pH=5.1, 200mM LiCl2
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.2M LiCl2
pH5.1
Pressure1
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 2D 15N-HSQC,3D 15N-DIPSI-HSQC, 2D 1H-DQF-COSY, 2D 1H-clean-TOCSY, 2D 1H-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 500.0
Varian INOVA 800.0
Bruker Avance 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, energy minimization
Details Distance restraints: 1660 Dihedral angle restraints: 61
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria accept.inp (XPLOR), low energy and good Ramachandran behaviour.
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 29
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker Biospin
2 processing version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker Biospin
3 processing version: 2.1 NMRPipe Delaglio, F.
4 data analysis version: 1.02 ANSIG Helgstrand, M.
5 refinement version: 3.851 X-PLOR --
6 data analysis version: 3.2 AQUA Laskowski, R.A.
7 data analysis version: 1999.019.15.47 TALOS Cornilescu, G.
8 data analysis version: 2K.1 MOLMOL Koradi, R.