SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.5 mM hERR2 U-15N 13C, 0.5 mM DNA Strand 1, 0.5 mM DNA Strand 2, 20 mM K2SO4, 50 M ZnSO4, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.001% NaN3 pH 6.8
Solvent100% D20
Ionic Strength20 mM K2SO4
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 2D Filter Edit Noesy
Sample Contents0.5 mM hERR2 U-15N, 0.5 mM DNA Strand 1, 0.5 mM DNA Strand 2, 20 mM K2SO4, 50 M ZnSO4, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.001% NaN3 pH 6.8
Solvent5% D2O, 95% H20
Ionic Strength20 mM K2SO4
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 2D Filter Filter Noesy
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker DRX 800.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry simulated annealing
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST ENERGY
Conformers Calculated Total Number 32
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution Amber 6.0 D.A.Case, D.A.Pearlman, J.W.Caldwell, T.E.Cheatham III, W.S.Ross, C.L.Simmerling, T.A.Darden, K.M.Merz, R.V.Stanton, A.L.Cheng, J.J.Vincent, M.Crowley, V.Tsui, R.J.Radmer, Y.Duan, J.Pitera, I.Massova, G.L.Seibel, U.C.Singh, P.K.Weiner, and P.A.Kollman
2 refinement DYANA 1.5 P.Gntert, C.Mumenthaler, K.Wthrich
3 refinement Amber 6.0 D.A.Case, D.A.Pearlman, et.al.
4 data analysis NMRView 4.1.3 B.A.Johnson, R.A.Blevins
5 processing NMRPipe 2.1 F.Delaglio, S.Grzesiek, G.W.Vuister, Z.Guang, J.Pfeifer, A.Bax