SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contentsunlabeled TAG 10 mM phosphate pH 6.6 100 mM NaCl 3 mM DTT 0.34 mM NaN3
Solvent>99 % deuterium
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH6.6
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D TOCSY
Sample ContentsU-15N-labeled TAG 10 mM phosphate pH 6.6 100 mM NaCl 3 mM DTT 0.34 mM NaN3
Solvent93 % water, 7 % deuterium
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH6.6
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample ContentsU-13C,15N-labled TAG 10 mM phosphate pH 6.6 100 mM NaCl 3 mM DTT 0.34 mM NaN3
Solvent93 % water, 7 % deuterium
Ionic Strength100 mM NaCl
pH6.6
Pressure1 atm
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):HCCH-TOCSY, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 4D_13C-separated_NOESY, HNCO, HNCA, CBCA(CO)NH, HNCACB
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITYplus 600.0
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker DRX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method Structures were calculated from an extended strand using CNS 1.1, and refined using XPLOR-NIH 1.1.2
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 25
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement XPLOR-NIH 1.1.2 Clore, G.M., Kuszewski, J., Schwieters, C.D., Tjandra, N.
2 data analysis Sparky 3 Goddard, T.D., Kneller, D.G.
3 processing NMRPipe 2.0 Delaglio, F.
4 structure solution CNS 1.1 Brunger, A.T.