SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.3mM U-15N,13C; 300mM NH4OAc; 95% H20, 10% D20
Solvent95% H20, 10% D20
Ionic Strength300mM NH4OAc
pH6.2
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):2D PFG-[15N]HSQC, 3D PFG-13C-EDITED NOESY, 3D PFG-15N-EDITED NOESY, 2D HSQC-J, N-H IPAP RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLING MEASUREMENTS, 3D PFG- 3D PFG-(HA)CA(CO)NH, 3D PFG-HA(CA)(CO)NH, 3D PFG-HA(CA)NH, 3D PFG-CBCANH, 3D PFG-CBCA(CO)NH, 3D PFG-(HA)CANH, 3D PFG-H 3D PFG-HBHA(CB)(CA)(CO)NH, 3D PFG-HCC(CO)NH-TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
VARIAN INOVA 600.0
VARIAN INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details X-PLOR-NIH VERSION 1.1.2 (G.M. CLORE,J. KUSZEWSKY,C. SCHWIETERS,N. TJANDRA) was also used for refinement
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria set of all structures within 5RT of LOWEST ENERGY STRUCTURE
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 n/a
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement DYANA 1.5 Guntert, Wuthrich, et al.
2 structure solution DYANA 1.5 Guntert
3 data analysis AUTOSTRUCTURE 1.0 Beta Huang
4 data analysis AUTOASSIGN 1.7.6 Moseley
5 processing NMRPipe 97.231.15.18 Delaglio
6 processing VNMR 6.1B VARIAN
7 collection VNMR 6.1B VARIAN