SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM U-15N,13C gag283, 50mM acetate buffer(pH5.0), 100mM NaCl, 5mM BME
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH5.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):4D_13C/15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM U-15N,2H gag283, 50mM acetate buffer(pH5.0), 100mM NaCl, 5mM BME
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH5.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):4D_15N/15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM U-15N gag283, 50mM acetate buffer(pH5.0), 100mM NaCl, 5mM BME
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength50
pH5.0
Pressure1
Temperature (K)303
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing, torsion angle dynamics
Details 20 CONFORMERS COMPATIBLE WITH THE NMR CONSTRAINTS WERE CALCULATED USING DYANA 1.5 AND THE STANDARD TORSION ANGLE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL. PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS WERE CARRIED OUT INDEPENDENTLY FOR MATRIX AND CAPSID N-TERMINAL DOMAINS OF THE PROTEIN. INITIALLY ONLY NOE DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS WERE IMPOSED. UNAMBIGUOUS H-BONDS WERE ALSO INCORPORATED TO REINFORCE CANONICAL SECONDARY STRUCTURE. THE INITIAL STRUCTURES WERE THEN USED TO ASSESS THE ACCURACY OF THE TORSION ANGLE CONSTRAINTS GENERATED BY ANALYSIS OF HA, CA, CB, CO AND N CHEMICAL SHIFTS WITH THE PROGRAM TALOS. FINALLY, ALL THE CONSTRAINTS WERE USED TO CALCULATE THE STRUCTURE OF THE WHOLE PROTEIN.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement DYANA 1.5 Guentert,P., Mumenthaler,C., & Wuthrich,K.
2 collection XWINNMR 2.6 n/a
3 processing NMRPipe 2.0 Delaglio
4 structure solution DYANA 1.5 Guentert