SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM UvrC-CTD 15N labelled 300mM Nacl, 50mM Phosphate buffer 0.2mM complete protease inhibitor 95% H2O, 5% D2O, pH 6.8
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength300mM Nacl, 50mM phosphate buffer
pH6.8
Pressureatmospheric
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM UvrC-CTD 15N 13C doublly labelled 300mM Nacl, 50mM Phosphate buffer 0.2mM complete protease inhibitor 95% H2O, 5% D2O, pH 6.8
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength300mM Nacl, 50mM phosphate buffer
pH6.8
Pressureatmospheric
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 750.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker AMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method A simulated annealing protocol in Cartesian space was used. Final refinement was done with explicit water.
Details Calculation was done on the basis of 1326 unambiguous and 60 ambiguous distance restraints with the inclusion of 68 dihedral angle constraints.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria no NOE distance violations > 0.5A and lowest energies after refining the best 50 of the initial 200 in explicit water
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 22
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 fewest violations,lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 1.0 A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.DeLano,P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang,J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren.
2 structure solution CNS 1.0 A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.DeLano,P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang,J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren.
3 structure solution ARIA 1.0 S.,Jens Linge, Michael Nilges
4 data analysis Nmrview 4.1.3 Bruce A. Johnson
5 processing NMRPipe version 1.8 Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., and Bax, A.