SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents3mM U-15N,13C-CBP:2059-2117 6mM 14N,12C-ACTR:1018-1088
Solvent10 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl 95%H2O,5%D2O
Ionic Strength60 mM
pH6.6
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)31
Experiment(s):4D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents3mM U-15N,12C-CBP:2059-2117 6mM 14N,12C-ACTR:1018-1088
Solvent10 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl 95%H2O,5%D2O
Ionic Strength60 mM
pH6.6
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)31
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA, HNHB
Sample Contents3mM U-15N,13C-CBP:2059-2117 6mM 14N,12C-ACTR:1018-1088
Solvent10 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl 100%D2O
Ionic Strength60 mM
pH6.6
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)31
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 12C-filtered/13C-edited-NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker AMX 600.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
Bruker DRX 800.0
Bruker AMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method Dyana, Sane, Amber
Details 200 structures originally calculated using unambiguous restraints in Dyana followed by the addition of ambiguous restraints for simulated annealing of the top 100 Dyana structures in Amber. Best 20 structures selected to represent the structure of the ACTR/CBP complex.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 fewest violations,lowest energy
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement version: 1.5 DYANA Wuthrich, et al.
2 processing version: 1 NMRPipe Delagio, et al.
3 collection version: 1 XWINNMR Bruker
4 collection version: 1 UXNMR Bruker
5 refinement version: 5.0 AMBER Case, et al.
6 data analysis version: 3.0 nmrview Johnson, B., et al.