SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 mM duplex, 12 mM Na2HPO4, 8 mM NaH2PO4, 56 mM NaCl, 50 uM NaN3
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM
pH6.7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)278
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1 mM duplex, 12 mM Na2HPO4, 8 mM NaH2PO4, 56mM NaCl, 50 uM NaN3
Solvent99.96% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM
pH6.7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)278
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1 mM duplex, 12 mM Na2HPO4, 8 mM NaH2PO4, 56mM NaCl, 50 uM NaN3
Solvent99.96% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM
pH6.7
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)288
Experiment(s):DQF-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITYPLUS 750.0
Varian UNITYPLUS 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method molecular dynamics
Details Distance restraints were derived by MORASS 2.5 using a total relaxation matrix approach. AMBER 5 was used for MD and minimization. The deposited structure represents the average of ten final structures
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 10
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques. Proton resonances were assigned using COSY, TOCSY, and NOESY data
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 iterative matrix relaxation version: 2.5 MORASS Gorenstein
2 structure solution version: 5 AMBER Case,Kollman, et al
3 refinement version: 5 AMBER Case,Kollman, et al