SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample ContentsSAMPLE 1: S100A1, U-15N; 12-15mM d11-tris, 1-2mM EGTA, 0.3mM NaN3, 15-18mM NaCl; pH 6.4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O. SAMPLE 2: S100A1, U-13C,15N; 12-15mM d11-tris, 1-2mM EGTA, 0.3mM NaN3, 15-18mM NaCl; pH 6.4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O.
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength25mM
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA, 2D_1H-15N_HSQC, 3D_15N_separated_HOHAHA
Sample ContentsS100A1, U-13C,15N; 12-15mM d11-tris, 1-2mM EGTA, 0.3mM NaN3, 15-18mM NaCl; pH 6.4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength25mM
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):4D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_HNCACB
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 800.0
Bruker DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry, simulated annealing, docking, molecular dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 75
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using constraints generated from heteronuclear, multi-dimensional NMR experiments.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CHARMM Harvard University
2 structure solution CHARMM Harvard University
3 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 A. Brunger
4 processing NMRPipe 1.8 F. Delaglio
5 collection XWINNMR 2.6 Bruker Analytik GmbH