SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample ContentsSAMPLE 1: S100A1, U-15N; 12-15mM d11-tris, 1-2mM EGTA, 0.3mM NaN3, 15-18mM NaCl; pH 6.4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O. SAMPLE 2: S100A1, U-13C,15N; 12-15mM d11-tris, 1-2mM EGTA, 0.3mM NaN3, 15-18mM NaCl; pH 6.4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O.
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength25mM
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA, 2D 1H-15N HSQC, 3D_15N_separated_HOHAHA
Sample ContentsS100A1, U-13C,15N; 12-15mM d11-tris, 1-2mM EGTA, 0.3mM NaN3, 15-18mM NaCl; pH 6.4, 95% H2O, 5% D2O
Solvent95% H2O/5% D2O
Ionic Strength25mM
pH6.4
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):4D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D HNCACB
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 600.0
Bruker DRX 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry, simulated annealing, docking, molecular dynamics
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 75
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using constraints generated from heteronuclear, multi-dimensional NMR experiments.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker Analytik GmbH
2 processing version: 1.8 NMRPipe F. Delaglio
3 structure solution version: 3.851 X-PLOR A. Brunger
4 structure solution CHARMM Harvard University
5 refinement CHARMM Harvard University