SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.8 mM [U-15N] Parvulin 10, 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTE
Solvent90 % H2O, 10 % D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM KCl
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)297.6
Experiment(s):HNHA, 3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents0.8 mM [U-13C, 15N] Parvulin 10, 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTE
Solvent90 % H2O, 10 % D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM KCl
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)297.6
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C/13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C/15N-separated_NOESY, 2D_MEXICO
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
Bruker DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method The averaged structure of the ensemble (1JNS) was regularized under experimental constraints
Details the structures are based on 1097 NOE-derived distance constraints, 68 dihedral restraints for CSI-derived helical regions, 42 3J(HN,HA) restraints, 30 distance constraints for hydrogen bonds based on CSI and MEXICO data.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 BRUNGER
2 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 BRUNGER ET AL.
3 structure solution CNS 0.5 BRUNGER ET AL.
4 structure solution ARIA 0.53 NILGES ET AL.
5 data analysis TRIAD 6.6 TRIPOS, ST. LOUIS
6 processing XWINNMR 2.6 BRUKER, KARLSRUHE
7 collection XWINNMR 2.6 BRUKER, KARLSRUHE