SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents3mM MTH1692 U-15N; 50mM phosphate buffer; 0.15 M NaCl; 1mM DTT; 1mM NaN3
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.3M
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)320
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents3mM MTH1692 U-15N,13C; 50mM phosphate buffer; 0.15 M NaCl; 1mM DTT; 1mM NaN3
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.3M
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)320
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents3mM MTH1692 unlabeled; 50mM phosphate buffer; 0.15 M NaCl; 1mM DTT; 1mM NaN3
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength0.3M
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)320
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents3mM MTH1692 unlabeled; 50mM phosphate buffer; 0.15 M NaCl; 1mM DTT; 1mM NaN3
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength0.3M
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)320
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 500.0
Varian UNITYplus 800.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details The structures are based on 1467 non-redundant NOE-derived distance constraints, 197 dihedral angle restraints, and 86 hydrogen bonds.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using standard triple-resonance NMR techniques.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution ARIA 0.9 Nilges
2 refinement CNS 0.9 Brunger
3 data analysis XEASY 1.3.13 Wuthrich
4 processing GIFA 4.31 Delsuc
5 collection XWINNMR 2.1 Bruker