SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.6 mM synthetic gp41 peptide, 200 mM perdeuterated dodecylphosphocholine
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength200 mM DPC-d38
pH3.51
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, DQF-COSY, 2D TOCSY
Sample Contents1.6 mM synthetic gp41 peptide, 200 mM perdeuterated dodecylphosphocholine
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength200 mM DPC-d38
pH3.51
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D TOCSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Bruker AVANCE 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry, simulated annealing, molecular dynamics, matrix relaxation
Details Structures were initially generated using CNS. Ambiguous and unassigned noe constraints were then used in conjuction with matrix relaxation analysis using the program ARIA.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 1.0 A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.Delano, P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang, J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren
2 iterative matrix relaxation ARIA 1.0 M.Nilges, J.Linge, S.O'Donoghue
3 structure solution CNS 1.0 A.T.Brunger, P.D.Adams, G.M.Clore, W.L.Delano, P.Gros, R.W.Grosse-Kunstleve, J.-S.Jiang, J.Kuszewski, M.Nilges, N.S.Pannu, R.J.Read, L.M.Rice, T.Simonson, G.L.Warren
4 data analysis NMRView 4.1.3 B.Johnson, R.A. Blevins
5 processing NMRPipe 1.8 F.Delaglio, S.Grzesiek, G.Vuister, G.Zhu, J.Pfeifer, A.Bax
6 collection XWINNMR 2.6 Bruker