SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2mM MTH1880 U-15N,13C; 25mM phosphate buffer, 300mM NaCl; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.6
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents2mM MTH1880 U-15N; 25mM phosphate buffer, 300mM NaCl; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.6
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA
Sample Contents1mM MTH1880 U-15N; 25mM phosphate buffer, 300mM NaCl; 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH7.6
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D_15N HSQC for H/D exchange
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 500.0
Bruker DRX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry simulated annealing molecular dynamics matrix relaxation torsion angle dynamics
Details the structures are based on a total of 762 restraints, 669 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 39 dihedral angle restraints,54 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria This model is the minimized average structure from 20 structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 1
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection XWINNMR 2.6 Bruker Inc.
2 structure solution MolMol 2.6.0 Wuthrich
3 refinement CNS 1.0 Brunger
4 collection VNMR 6.1B Varian Inc.
5 data analysis Sparky 3.98 James
6 processing NMRPipe 1.8 Delaglio
7 structure solution Insight II 2000 MSI Inc.