SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM EGF-AB, 20mM CaCl2
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength0.060
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, DQF-COSY
Sample Contents1mM 15N-EGF-AB, 20mM CaCl2
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength0.060
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1.5mM EGF-A, 20mM CaCl2
Solvent99% D2O
Ionic Strength0.060
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents1.5mM EGF-A, 20mM CaCl2
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength0.060
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):HNHA
Sample Contents1.5mM EGF-A, 20mM CaCl2
Solvent95% H2O, 5% D2O
Ionic Strength0.060
pH5.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)295
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DMX 750.0
NMR Refinement
Method 1. Torsion angles dynamics 2. Restrained molecular dynamics with calcium 3. Energy minimisation
Details The structures are based on: 874 NOE restraints, 64 phi dihedral angles, 14 chi1 dihedral angles, 14 hydrogen bonds, 9 calcium ion ligand restraints
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria Energy minimised average structure from 30 selected structure with lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 15N T1, T2, and NOE relaxations to obtain backbone dynamics information T1/T2 data were not used for structure refinement
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis MOLMOL 2.6 R. Koradi
2 refinement X-PLOR 3.85 A. Brunger
3 structure solution DYANA 1.5 P. Guntert
4 processing SPARKY 3.95 T. Goddard & D. G. Kneller
5 collection XWINNMR 2.6 Bruker