SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.5mM BSTI
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):TOCSY,NOESY
Sample Contents1.5mM BSTI
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):TOCSY,NOESY,DQF-COSY
Sample Contents1.5mM BSTI
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):TOCSY,NOESY,DQF-COSY
Sample Contents1.5mM BSTI
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)305
Experiment(s):TOCSY,NOESY
Sample Contents1.5mM BSTI
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)293
Experiment(s):TOCSY,NOESY,DQF-COSY,ECOSY
Sample Contents1.5mM BSTI
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):TOCSY,NOESY,DQF-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker AMX 500.0
Bruker DMX 750.0
NMR Refinement
Method torsion angle dynamics
Details Preliminary structures were generated with a torsion angle dynamics protocol within DYANA. Final structures were generated with TAD in XPLOR. Structures were energy minimised under influence of the CHARMM forcefield.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker
2 processing version: 2.6 XWINNMR Bruker
3 data analysis version: 1.3.7 XEASY Eccles
4 refinement version: 1.5 DYANA Guentert
5 refinement version: 3.815 X-PLOR Brunger
6 refinement version: 21 CHARMM Brooks