SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.2 MM [U-15N]APO-DCP, 50 MM PHOSPHATE BUFFER
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength50 MM PHOSPHATE
pH5.80
PressureAMBIENT
Temperature (K)298.00
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, 3D_13C-SEPARATED_NOESY, 2D 15N-FILTERED NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
BRUKER DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS
Details THE STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1582 NON-TRIVIAL UPPER-LIMIT DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS (332 LONG-RANGE, 560 MEDIUM-RANGE, 372 SEQUENTIAL AND 318 INTRARESIDUE), DERIVED FROM 3288 ASSIGNED NOES FROM 4 2D AND 3D SPECTRA. THIS CORRESPONDS TO AN AVERAGE OF 19.8 CONSTRAINTS/RESIDUE. NO ADDITIONAL CONSTRAINTS WERE INCLUDED. STRUCTURES WERE GENERATED USING THE ANNEAL FUNCTION OF THE PROGRAM DYANA 1.5, WITH 8000 TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS STEPS FOR EACH STRUCTURE. THE AVERAGE DYANA TARGET FUNCTION FOR THE 30 CONFORMERS WAS 0.68 +/- 0.11. THE AVERAGE BACKBONE ATOMIC RMSD TO THE MEAN STRUCTURE FOR RESIDUES 4-81 IS 0.43 +/- 0.08 ANGSTROMS, AND 0.86 +/- 0.09 FOR ALL NON-HYDROGEN ATOMS (RESIDUES 4-81).
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria n/a
Conformers Calculated Total Number 1
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 COMPLETE RESONANCE ASSIGNMENTS OBTAINED WITH TRIPLE-RESONANCE NMR DATA AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIMARY CITATION.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis XEASY 1.3 Guntert
2 collection XWINNMR 2.3 Bruker
3 processing NMRPIPE Frank Delaglio, NIH
4 processing FELIX 95 MSI
5 refinement DYANA 1.5 PETER GUNTERT