SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.002 M GAMMA DELTA RESOLVASE (1-105) U-15N; 0.020 M PHOSPHATE BUFFER, PH 6.5; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solventn/a
Ionic Strength1M
pH6.50
Pressure1
Temperature (K)298.00
Experiment(s):3D_15N-SEPARATED_NOESY, HNHA, 3D_13C-SEPARATED_ NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
VARIAN INOVA 500.0
VARIAN INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS AND SIMULATED ANNEALING
Details THE NMR RESTRAINTS INCLUDED 2109 USEFUL NOE DETERMINED UPPER DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, 35 HYDROGEN BONDS, AND 297 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS. STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED IN THE DYANA USING TORSION ANGLE DYNAMICS. THE CALCULATION STARTED WITH 200 RANDOMIZED STRUCTURES. THE 19 STRUCTURES WITH THE LOWEST TARGET FUNCTION WERE REFINED WITHIN XPLOR USING SIMULATED ANNEALING. THE 19 REFINED STRUCTURAL CONFORMERS DISPLAYED NO NOE VIOLATIONS >0.3 ANGSTROMS AND NO DIHEDRAL ANGLE VIOLATIONS >3 DEGREES. THE MINIMIZED AVERAGE STRUCTURE WAS CALCULATED FROM THE MEAN POSITIONS OF THE COORDINATES FOR THE 19 STRUCTURAL CONFORMERS AND WAS REFINED BY POWELL ENERGY MINIMIZATION IN XPLOR USING FULL NMR RESTRAINTS.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE- RESONANCE 3D NMR SPECTROSCOPY FOR RESONANCE ASSIGNMENTS AND DOUBLE-RESONANCE 3D NMR SPECTROSCOPY FOR OBTAINING NOESY DATA.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution DYANA 1.5 n/a
2 structure solution XEASY 1.3.13 n/a
3 structure solution NMRPIPE 1.7 n/a
4 structure solution VNMR 6.1 n/a
5 refinement XPLOR 4.0 BRUNGER