SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data

Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.3mM N-domain ERp29 U-15N,13C
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength.1
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):HNCA, HNCO, HN(CO)CA, 3D_15N-separated_NOESY, 3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 1H-15N HSQC, 1H-13C HSQC
Sample Contents0.3mM N-domain ERp29
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength.1
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, 2D TOCSY, 2D DQF COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian UNITYplus 800.0
Bruker DMX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method torsion angle dynamics, simulated annealing
Details The input for the final structure calculation of N-domain protein consisted of 1279 upper limit distance restraints and 358 dihedral angle restraints. 185 of the dihedral angle restraints reflected coupling constant information, while 173 of them had been derived by HABAS from NOE and steric restraints alone.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy,target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy. model #1 was best after dyana calculations, model #17 was best after opal refinement
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The signal assignment was determined using triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy. The structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis MOLMOL 2.6.0 Koradi
2 refinement OPAL 2.6 Luginbul
3 structure solution DYANA 1.5 Guentert
4 data analysis XEASY 970326 Bartels
5 processing PROSA 3.6 Guentert
6 collection XWINNMR 2.5 Bruker