SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents0.5 mM HGA 1-31 (D1V, K3H, S9I, Q20P); 20 mM sodium acetate-d3, 10% D2O, 90% H2O
Solvent10% D2O, 90% H2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)288
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents0.5 mM HGA 1-31 (D1V, K3H, S9I, Q20P); 20 mM sodium acetate-d3, 10% D2O, 90% H2O
Solvent10% D2O, 90% H2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents0.5 mM HGA 1-31 (D1V, K3H, S9I, Q20P); 20 mM sodium acetate-d3, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)288
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents0.5 mM HGA 1-31 (D1V, K3H, S9I, Q20P); 20 mM sodium acetate-d3, 100% D2O
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strengthn/a
pH5.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 500.0
Bruker AVANCE 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry and simulated annealing
Details The structures are based on a total of 241 restraints, 174 are unambiguous NOE-derived distance constraints, 47 ambiguous NOE-derived distance constraints, 8 dihedral angle restraints, 10 distance restraints from hydrogen bonds, 2 distance restraints from disulfide bonds.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 This structure was determined using standard 2D homonuclear techniques
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution X-PLOR 3.1 Brunger
2 refinement X-PLOR 3.1 Brunger