SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.0 mM 1:1 SID unlabeled, PAH2 U-15N; 1.6 mM 1:1 SID unlabeled, PAH2 U-15N, U-13C.
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength20 mM phosphate
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):3D 15N-separated_NOESY, HNHA, 3D HNHB
Sample Contents1.6 mM 1:1 SID unlabeled, PAH2 U-15N,13C; 20 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.0, 0.2% NaN3
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength20 mM phosphate
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):2D 13C,15N-double-half-filtered NOESY, 2D 13C-double-half-filtered NOESY
Sample Contents1.6 mM 1:1 SID unlabeled, PAH2 U-15N,13C; 20 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.0, 0.2% NaN3
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength20 mM phosphate
pH6.0
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)300
Experiment(s):3D 13C-separated_NOESY, 3D HACAHB, 2D Spin-echo Difference for JNCgamma, JC'Cgamma
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 500.0
Varian INOVA 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry, simulated annealing
Details The structures are based on 1612 unique distance constraints, 198 torsion angle constraints and 72 JHNHA coupling constant constraints.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with favorable non-bond energy,structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 25
Conformers Submitted Total Number 15
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 minimized average structure
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 Interproton NOEs were assigned iteratively but manually during structure refinement.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement CNS 1.0 Brunger
2 structure solution DYANA 1.5 Guntert, Wuthrich
3 data analysis FELIX 98 Molecular Simulations
4 processing FELIX 98 Molecular Simulations