SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2.1 mM AB zipper; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength10 mM
pH5.65
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)310
Experiment(s):DQF-COSY, 2D TOCSY, 2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker DRX 800.0
Bruker DRX 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method 1. DISTANCE GEOMETRY/REGULARIZATION, 2. SIMULATED ANNEALING, 3. MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION INCLUDING 8 ANGSTROMS WATER SHELL
Details STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF 1494 NOE DERIVED DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS AND 52 PHI ANGLE RESTRAINTS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 25
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING STANDARD 2D HOMONUCLEAR TECHNIQUES
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.851 Brunger
2 structure solution X-PLOR 3.851 Brunger
3 processing FELIX 98 Molecular Simulations, Inc.
4 collection XWINNMR 2.6 BRUKER