SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1 mM of U-15N,13C MMP-13 in an equimolar complex with WAY-151693 in a buffer containing 10 mM deuterated Tris-Base, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM NaN3, 10 mM deuterated DTT, in 100% D2O at pH 6.5 and 35C
Solvent100% D2O
Ionic Strength10 mM deuterated Tris-Base, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM NaN3, 10 mM deuterated DTT
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY, 3D_C13-edited/filtered-NOESY
Sample Contents1 mM of U-15N,13C MMP-13 in an equimolar complex with WAY-151693 in a buffer containing 10 mM deuterated Tris-Base, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM NaN3, 10 mM deuterated DTT, in 90% H2O, 10% D2O at pH 6.5 and 35C
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength10 mM deuterated Tris-Base, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM NaN3, 10 mM deuterated DTT
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):HNHA
Sample Contents1 mM of U-15N MMP-13 in an equimolar complex with WAY-151693 in a buffer containing 10 mM deuterated Tris-Base, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM NaN3, 10 mM deuterated DTT, in 90% H2O, 10% D2O at pH 6.5 and 35C
Solvent90% H2O, 10% D2O
Ionic Strength10 mM deuterated Tris-Base, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 2 mM NaN3, 10 mM deuterated DTT
pH6.5
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)308
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker AMX-2 600.0
NMR Refinement
Method distance geometry simulated annealing
Details structures calculated were based on 3280 experimental NMR restraints, consisting of 2415 approximate interproton distance restraints, 47 distance restraints between MMP-13 and WAY-151693, 5 intramolecular distance restraints for WAY-151693, 88 distance restraints for 44 backbone hydrogen bonds, 391 torsion angle restraints, 103 3JNHa restraints 123 Ca restraints and 108 Cb restraints. The structure was also refined using a conformational database.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with acceptable covalent geometry,structures with favorable non-bond energy,structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy,target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 30
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using triple-resonance and isotope filtered NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 refinement X-PLOR 3.84 Brunger
2 data analysis PIPP 4.2.8 Garrett
3 structure solution X-PLOR 3.84 Brunger
4 processing NMRPipe 1.7 Delaglio
5 collection XWINNMR 2.0 Bruker