SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1mM Reps1 EH domain U-15N,13C; 10mM d-imidazole buffer, 1.5mM CaCl2; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM NaCl
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)30
Experiment(s):3D_13C-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM Reps1 EH domain U-15N; 10mM d-imidazole buffer, 1.5mM CaCl2; 90% H2O, 10% D2O
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM NaCl
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)30
Experiment(s):3D_15N-separated_NOESY
Sample Contents1mM Reps1 EH domain; 10mM d-imidazole buffer, 1.5mM CaCl2
Solvent99% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM NaCl
pH6.8
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)30
Experiment(s):2D NOESY, DQF-COSY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Bruker Avance 600.0
Bruker AMX 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method simulated annealing
Details The structures are based on a total of 1265 restraints, 1143 are NOE-derived distance constraints, 122 dihedral angle restraints.
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 40
Conformers Submitted Total Number 30
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 The structure was determined using heteronuclear 2D and 3D NMR spectroscopy.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 collection version: 1.7 XWINNMR Bruker
2 processing version: 1.7 XWINNMR Bruker
3 data analysis version: 1.1.2 FELIX Hare/Biosym
4 structure solution version: 3.1 X-plor Brunger/Biosym
5 refinement version: 3.1 X-plor Brunger/Biosym