SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents2.9 to 3.2 mM unlabeled A. v. PCu; 100 mM NaCl
Solvent90% H2O/10% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM
pH6.9
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Sample Contents2.9 to 3.2 mM unlabeled A. v. PCu; 100 mM NaCl
Solvent99.9% D2O
Ionic Strength100 mM
pH6.9
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):2D NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 750.0
Varian INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method Distance geometry, simulated annealing and restrained energy minimization
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 60
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 lowest energy
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 INPUT DATA FOR STRUCTURE CALCULATION: 595 INTRARESIDUAL RESTRAINTS, 279 SEQUENTIAL RESTRAINTS, 585 INTERRESIDUAL RESTRAINTS, 49 DIHEDRAL (PHI) RESTRAINTS, 29 DIHEDRAL (CHI) RESTRAINTS, 9 DIHEDRAL (OMIGA_PROLIN) RESTRAINTS, 0 HYDROGEN BOND RESTRAINTS, 4 COPPER RESTRAINTS. THE RMS DEVIATION FROM IDEALIZED GEOMETRY: BONDS:0.0031 ANGSTROMS, ANGLES:1.06 ANGSTROMS, IMPROPERS:0.42 ANGSTROMS.
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 structure solution version: 3.851 X-PLOR Brunger
2 refinement version: 3.851 X-PLOR Brunger