SOLUTION NMR Experimental Data


Experimental Details
Sample Conditions
Sample Contents1.5mM RNA, non-isotopically labelled
Solvent10mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.40 96% H2O, 4% D2O or 100% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM
pH6.40
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)283
Experiment(s):P31-decoupled DQF COSY, HP COSY, D2O NOESY, H2O NOESY
Sample Contents1.5mM RNA, non-isotopically labelled
Solvent10mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.40 96% H2O, 4% D2O or 100% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM
pH6.40
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):P31-decoupled DQF COSY, HP COSY, D2O NOESY, H2O NOESY
Sample Contents1mM RNA, U-15N,13C
Solvent10mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.40 96% H2O, 4% D2O or 100% D2O
Ionic Strength10mM
pH6.40
Pressureambient
Temperature (K)298
Experiment(s):3D HCP, 3D HMQC-TOCSY, 3D C13-edited NOESY
Spectrometer Information
Manufacturer Model Field Strength
Varian INOVA 800.0
Varian INOVA 500.0
NMR Refinement
Method Simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics
Details SEE REFERENCE ABOVE
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 25
Representative Model Choice Rationale
1 closest to the average
Additional NMR Experimental Information
1 THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING TRIPLE RESONANCE HCN AND HCP EXPERIMENTS ON N15,C13-LABELLED RNA
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Software Name Author
1 data analysis SPARKY 3.8 Goddard
2 refinement X-PLOR 3.1 Brunger